You don't appear to have JavaScript enabled. Some parts of this site may not display correctly. Please enable JavaScript in your browser preferences for a significantly enhanced experience.
Skip to content
Home
The Issue
The Problem
The Transparency Solution
The Wider Movement
About Us
Achievements
Meet the Team
Accountability
Vacancies
Contact Us
Index
Resources
Updates
Index
Major donors
United States
United Kingdom
European Commission
Germany
France
Japan
World Bank
2013 Index
2012 Index
Executive Summary
Play with the data
Data & Methodology
2011 Pilot Index
Data & Methodology
Findings & Recommendations
Play with the data
Report pdf
2010 Assessment
Comments and Coverage
Select a donor
--------------
AfDB
AsDB
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
China
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
EBRD
EC — DG Enlargement
EC — ECHO
EC — EuropeAid
EIB
Estonia
Finland
France
GAVI
Germany — GIZ
Germany — KfW
Global Fund
Greece
Hewlett
Hungary
IADB
Ireland
Italy
Japan
Korea — EDCF
Korea — KOICA
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
Switzerland
UK — CDC
UK — DFID
UNDP
US — DoD
US — MCC
US — PEPFAR
US — State
US — Treasury
US — USAID
World Bank — IDA
World Bank — IFC
2011 Pilot Aid Transparency Index
Some donors do well, all donors can do better.
Findings and Recommendations
Methodology
Play with the data
Report (PDF)
Data (CSV)
Index Home
Overall scores
Fair
World Bank - IDA
Global Fund
AfDB
Netherlands
UK - DFID
Sweden
US - MCC
Denmark
EC - EuropeAid
Moderate
UNDP
EC - ECHO
EC - DG Enlargement
Estonia
IADB
EBRD
AsDB
World Bank - IFC
Belgium
Poor
Switzerland
Finland
Germany - KfW
Korea - KOICA
Japan
Czech Republic
Austria
US - PEPFAR
Norway
Canada
France
New Zealand
Ireland
Luxembourg
Hewlett
Lithuania
GAVI
Australia
EIB
US - USAID
Germany - GIZ
US - State
Slovenia
Slovakia
Korea - EDCF
Very poor
Spain
Portugal
US - DoD
UK - CDC
Latvia
US - Treasury
Italy
Poland
Hungary
Romania
Bulgaria
China
Greece
Cyprus
Malta