Please note: You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please update to IE10 here to properly experience the ATI website.

3.

UK – Department for International Development (DFID)

Very good

ATI_Donor Graph-03

OVERVIEW

DFID is responsible for approximately 90% of the UK’s ODA and leads on setting development assistance policy. It jointly administers the partially ODA-funded Conflict Pool with FCO and MOD. See UK-wide commitments and recommendations.

DFID was the first organisation to publish to the IATI Registry, in January 2011. It should be congratulated for refreshing its data on a monthly basis and for exploring traceability of aid flows, by integrating the IATI data of its NGO implementing partners with its own IATI data. DFID published a revised implementation schedule in December 2012, which sets out an ambitious plan for covering almost the entire IATI standard by 2015. It is currently piloting the IATI budget identifier.

DFID published an ambitious open data strategy in June 2012.[1] In June 2013 it launched a beta version of its new aid information platform, Development Tracker – devtracker.dfid.gov.uk – which presents IATI data from DFID and its partners to increase traceability. In December 2012, the Secretary of State launched an Aid Transparency Challenge Fund to stimulate the development of tools for using open aid data.

ANALYSIS

Although DFID has dropped in the ranking from 2012 from first to third, this is a reflection of very high quality IATI publications from MCC and GAVI and not a reduction in DFID’s transparency or a deceleration in its progress. DFID performs particularly well on commitment indicators, scoring 95% of the total possible score. It achieves almost full scores at the organisation level and for basic activity indicators. There is some room for improvement on performance data and linking project documents in its IATI data, although DFID has begun to do this consistently for new projects. Of the 22 indicators measured by format, DFID publishes information on 21 in IATI XML format.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • DFID should continue to improve the quality and breadth of its IATI data, including structured results and conditions data and geo-coded sub-national location data for all projects.
  • DFID should work with other UK government aid-spending departments to help them publish to IATI or improve their existing publication, including working with FCO and MOD to publish the activities of the Conflict Pool.
  • DFID should complete its pilot of the IATI budget identifier and share lessons with the IATI community.

 

 

Close

DONOR PROFILE

First published to IATI:

Jan-11

Data was found in the following formats where relevant:

95% IATI

0% CSV/Excel

0% PDF

0% Website

5% Not Published

SCORING

83.49%

COMMITMENT TO
AID TRANSPARENCY:

9.49/10

PUBLICATION
ORGANISATION LEVEL:

22.88/25

PUBLICATION
ACTIVITY LEVEL:

51.12/65

Commitment

1. FOIA

2. Implementation Schedules

3. Accessibility

Publication Status
Source

http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php

Comments

Global RTI rating score of 99. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Click here for indicator definition
Click here to view history

1. FOIA

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Document
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 99. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Donor Review
Document
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Document
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 99. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Donor Comments

Publication Status
Source

http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/

Comments

Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.

Click here for indicator definition
Click here to view history

2. Implementation schedules

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Document
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.

Donor Review
Document
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Document
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of implementation schedules.

Donor Comments

Publication Status
Source

http://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/

Comments

The Development Tracker was made publicly accessible by the time of this review. This portal meets all three criteria.

Click here for indicator definition
Click here to view history

3. Accessibility

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Document
http://projects.dfid.gov.uk/default.aspx
Total points calculated by adding points received on each of the three criteria below: 1) Allows free bulk export - 0 2) Detailed Expand...disaggregated data - 33 3) Open licence - 33

Donor Review
Document
http://projects.dfid.gov.uk/default.aspx
All data can be: 1) Free bulk export is available via IATI (evidence: iatiregistry.org) 2) Detailed disaggregated data is available in IATI format Expand...(evidence: iatiregistry.org) 3) All under an open licence (UK Open Government Licence)

PWYF Review
IATI data is not used to score the portal/projects database.

Independent Reviewer
Disagree
IATI data is not used to score the portal/projects database.

PWYF Final Assessment
Document
http://devtracker.dfid.gov.uk/
The Development Tracker was made publicly accessible by the time of this review. This portal meets all three criteria.

Donor Comments

Planning

Financial

4. Organisation Strategy

5. Annual Report

6. Allocation Policy

7. Procurement Policy

8. Country Strategy

9. Total Budget

10. Disaggregated Budgets

11. Audit

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 96.43%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

Always

Format: Document

Source

No data available.

Comments

No data available.

Click here for indicator definition
Click here to view history

11. Audit

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Document

Basic

Classifications

Financial

Performance

12. Implementer

13. Unique ID

14. Title

15. Description

16. Planned Dates

17. Actual Dates

18. Current Status

19. Contact Details

20. Collaboration Type

21. Flow Type

22. Aid Type

23. Finance Type

24. Sector

25. Sub-national Location

26. Tied Aid Status

33. Overall Cost

34. Planned Expenditure

35. Actual Expenditure

36. Budget Identifier

37. Results

38. Impact Appraisals

39. Conditions

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 88%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.5%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 98%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.66%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 85%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 1%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 1%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 22%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 52%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 38%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 5.32%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 5%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 95%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 95%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 86%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

Not Published

Source

No data available.

Comments

The budget ID has been provisionally agreed by the IATI Steering Committee and is available for use by donors. As in 2012, this indicator applies to all donors included in the Index.

Click here for indicator definition
Click here to view history

36. Budget Identifier

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Not published
Not published
N/A
This information could not be found.

Donor Review
Not published
Not published
We are participating in the Budget Identifier pilot during 2013.

PWYF Review
Not published
Not published
Information is yet to be published.

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Not published
Not published
The budget ID has been provisionally agreed by the IATI Steering Committee and is available for use by donors. As in Expand...2012, this indicator applies to all donors included in the Index.

Donor Comments

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 11.47%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 39%

Click here for indicator definition

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 67.55%

Click here for indicator definition

>