Please note: You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please update to IE10 here to properly experience the ATI website.

6.

Sweden

Very good

6

OVERVIEW

The 2014 ATI takes into account information published by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida).

Sweden began publishing to the IATI Standard in November 2011 and updates its data on a monthly basis. It should be congratulated on the improvements it has made to its data, publishing 15 additional information items since 2013. Its implementation schedule outlines plans to publish to 95% of the assessed IATI fields by the end of 2015. In 2014, Sweden launched a new version of its open aid data portal – openaid.se – which is driven by IATI data. As an EU Member State, Sweden is part of the EU’s collective commitment to both the EU Transparency Guarantee and the Busan common standard, of which IATI is a core component. It is a member of OGP and has included commitments on aid transparency in its National Action Plan. It has also endorsed the Open Aid Partnership and is one of the few countries to publish the IATI budget identifier. Sweden co-hosts the IATI Secretariat as part of a consortium with UNDP, UNOPS, Ghana and Development Initiatives.

ANALYSIS

Sweden places in the very good category and scores 83.3%, an increase of 23 percentage points since the 2013 ATI. It ranks third out of 50 bilaterals. It is one of only three organisations in the 2014 index to publish all activity and organisation level indicators to the IATI Registry. Sweden leads on commitment indicators within the very good category and performs well on organisation planning and financial information, scoring over 99% on these sub-groups of indicators. At the activity level, it scores over 90% on basic and classifications information. It performs less well on results and provision of links to project documents in its IATI files, publishing this information for less than 10% of the activities assessed. It is one of the few organisations to publish the budget identifier, which aims to help align information on development flows with recipient country budget classifications. For the 22 indicators that take format into account, all the information is published in IATI XML. 

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • Sweden should include forward-looking budgets, links to project documents and results and conditions data for all its activities in its IATI files.
  • It should use its IATI data in its programming and coordination processes and promote the access and use of this information by others.
  • Sweden should continue to champion work on the IATI budget identifier, aiming for roll out in 2015.

Close

DONOR PROFILE

First published to IATI:

Nov-11

2013 ATI Score:

60.38%

2013 ATI Rank:

9



Visit ATI 2013...

INDICATOR SCORING

TOTAL

83.27%


COMMITMENT TO
AID TRANSPARENCY:

9.82/10


PUBLICATION
ORGANISATION LEVEL:

24.82/25


PUBLICATION
ACTIVITY LEVEL:

48.63/65

Commitment

1. FOIA

2. Implementation Schedules

3. Accessibility

Publication Status
Source

http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php

Comments

Global RTI rating score of 92. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100


Click here to view history

1. FOIA

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 92. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Donor Review
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 92. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Publication Status
Source

http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/

Comments

Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules


Click here to view history

2. Implementation schedules

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules

Donor Review
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules

Publication Status
Source

http://openaid.se

Comments

Portals are scored using three criteria: 1) the portal allows free, bulk export of data; 2) it contains detailed disaggregated data; 3) the data is published under an open licence. Each of these carry 1/3rd of the total points of 100. Openaid.se meets all 3 criteria.


Click here to view history

3. Accessibility

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://openaid.se
Portals are scored using three criteria: 1) the portal allows free, bulk export of data; 2) it contains detailed disaggregated data; Expand...3) the data is published under an open licence. Each of these carry 1/3rd of the total points of 100. Openaid.se meets all 3 criteria.

Donor Review
http://openaid.se

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree
Open Aid is a very important initiative and in general fulfills its purpose. However, our experience is that not all relevant Expand...data is available.

PWYF Final Assessment
http://openaid.se
Portals are scored using three criteria: 1) the portal allows free, bulk export of data; 2) it contains detailed disaggregated data; Expand...3) the data is published under an open licence. Each of these carry 1/3rd of the total points of 100. Openaid.se meets all 3 criteria.

Planning

Financial

4. Organisation Strategy

5. Annual Report

6. Allocation Policy

7. Procurement Policy

8. Country Strategy

9. Total Budget

10. Disaggregated Budgets

11. Audit

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 94.44%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 94.21%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Basic

Classifications

Financial

Performance

12. Implementer

13. Unique ID

14. Title

15. Description

16. Planned Dates

17. Actual Dates

18. Current Status

19. Contact Details

20. Collaboration Type

21. Flow Type

22. Aid Type

23. Finance Type

24. Sector

25. Sub-national Location

26. Tied Aid Status

33. Budget

34. Commitments

35. Disbursements And Expenditure

36. Budget Identifier

37. Results

38. Impact Appraisals

39. Conditions

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 87.96%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.98%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 85.9%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 0.05%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.88%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.98%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.94%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 0.18%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 96.02%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 9.62%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 5.6%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 2.12%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 5.4%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 4.36%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 1.5%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 27.42%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 62.23%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 91.33%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 31.84%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 2.73%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 2.12%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 54.81%