Please note: You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please update to IE10 here to properly experience the ATI website.

3.

U.S. – Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC)

Very good

3

OVERVIEW

MCC is a U.S. foreign assistance agency providing large-scale, multi-year grants for global poverty reduction. The agency currently manages compacts and threshold programmes in 38 countries. See U.S.-wide commitments and recommendations.

In June 2013, MCC published information on all current Compacts and Thresholds in IATI XML, including planning, obligation and spending data on its Open Data Catalogue. In June 2014, this information was made available via the IATI Registry. MCC should be congratulated for continuing to publish high quality data and for publishing an ambitious implementation schedule – the first U.S. agency to publish an agency-specific plan for implementing IATI.

ANALYSIS

MCC scores 86.9%, placing it in the very good category. It ranks thirdoverall, and second out of 50 bilateral agencies in the 2014 Index. MCC continues to publish comprehensive information on its activities, including commitments, disbursement and expenditures and added-value fields such as project documents, results and conditions. It is the highest scoring donor on performance data, reflecting significant improvements in the quality and detail of its results data. MCC also publishes specific conditions alongside activities. It is one of the few donors to score on the budget ID, which aims to help align information on development flows with recipient country budget classifications, and disaggregated budgets, including information for three years ahead of the current fiscal year. The latter is in part due to MCC’s compact design, which extends for five fiscal years. It is the only U.S. agency that provides project-level documents and both forward-looking organisation budgets and disaggregated budgets in its IATI files. Four indicators – flow type, aid type, finance type and tied aid status – could not be assessed automatically for the Index as the activities for which these are available do not contain dates and therefore could not be identified as “current” projects.[1] MCC is one of the few organisations to score on all 39 indicators. Of the 22 indicators that take format into account, all are published in machine-readable format.



[1] These indicators are published in activities above the level of a compact in each country, e.g. “MCC Tanzania”. These activities do not contain any dates as they do not pertain to a specific unit of aid. The classifications should have been placed on the relevant compact.

RECOMMENDATIONS

  • MCC should continue to improve its publication to IATI so it is comprehensive and includes information on sub-national location, forward-looking budgets and links to contracts and tenders for all activities.
  • MCC should ensure that the quality and integrity of its data is maintained and updated at least quarterly.
  • MCC should continue to champion aid transparency and promote the use of its IATI data by developing a plan for systematic outreach to stakeholders including Millennium Challenge Accounts and local partners.

Close

DONOR PROFILE

First published to IATI:

Jan-13

2013 ATI Score:

88.88%

2013 ATI Rank:

1



Visit ATI 2013...

INDICATOR SCORING

TOTAL

86.89%


COMMITMENT TO
AID TRANSPARENCY:

8.05/10


PUBLICATION
ORGANISATION LEVEL:

23.51/25


PUBLICATION
ACTIVITY LEVEL:

55.34/65

Commitment

1. FOIA

2. Implementation Schedules

3. Accessibility

Publication Status
Source

http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php

Comments

Global RTI rating score of 89. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100


Click here to view history

1. FOIA

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 89. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Donor Review
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
no comment since this ranks US law, not MCC policy

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://www.rti-rating.org/country_data.php
Global RTI rating score of 89. Score conversion from total score on Global RTI rating to Index points done using the Expand...following scale: 1 - 60: 33 61- 90: 66 91 - 150: 100

Publication Status
Source

http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/

Comments

Based on Publish What You Fund's analysis of the new IATI implementation schedule published by MCC.


Click here to view history

2. Implementation schedules

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on total score received on Publish What You Fund's analysis of Common Standard/IATI implementation schedules

Donor Review
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
MCC is currently rebuilding out IATI file and we do plan to publish an agency implementation schedule that will be posted Expand...on our website and updated as out plans for publishing evolve. Because the USG has a single reporting structure into the IATI Registry, the file on the Registry will remain a USG file, and ours will simply provide end users with more specific information on MCC's efforts.

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://tracker.publishwhatyoufund.org/plan/organisations/
Based on Publish What You Fund's analysis of the new IATI implementation schedule published by MCC.

Publication Status
Source

http://data.mcc.gov

Comments

Data.mcc.gov meets all three criteria for scoring on this indicator


Click here to view history

3. Accessibility

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
http://data.mcc.gov
Data.mcc.gov meets all three criteria for scoring on this indicator.

Donor Review
http://data.mcc.gov

PWYF Review

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
http://data.mcc.gov
Data.mcc.gov meets all three criteria for scoring on this indicator

Planning

Financial

4. Organisation Strategy

5. Annual Report

6. Allocation Policy

7. Procurement Policy

8. Country Strategy

9. Total Budget

10. Disaggregated Budgets

11. Audit

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 90.91%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 33.33%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Basic

Classifications

Financial

Performance

12. Implementer

13. Unique ID

14. Title

15. Description

16. Planned Dates

17. Actual Dates

18. Current Status

19. Contact Details

20. Collaboration Type

21. Flow Type

22. Aid Type

23. Finance Type

24. Sector

25. Sub-national Location

26. Tied Aid Status

33. Budget

34. Commitments

35. Disbursements And Expenditure

36. Budget Identifier

37. Results

38. Impact Appraisals

39. Conditions

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.66%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

Always

Format: Machine-readable

Source

http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml

Comments

Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.


Click here to view history

21. Flow Type

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.

Donor Review
Always
Machine readable

PWYF Review
Always
Machine readable

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.

Publication Status

Always

Format: Machine-readable

Source

http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml

Comments

Aid type appears to be C01 (i.e. project type interventions) for all activities


Click here to view history

22. Aid Type

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Aid type appears to be C01 (i.e. project type interventions) for all activities.

Donor Review
Always
Machine readable

PWYF Review
Always
Machine readable

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Aid type appears to be C01 (i.e. project type interventions) for all activities

Publication Status

Always

Format: Machine-readable

Source

http://datafagov.azurewebsites.net/Activities/Burkina_Faso.xml

Comments

Finance type is available in MCC's IATI files, and can be inferred from parent activities. However, this information cannot be automatically assessed as the data does not conform to the Aid Transparency Index methodology (the relevant activities do not contain dates, and therefore do not meet the requirements of the current data test)


Click here to view history

23. Finance Type

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Iati

Donor Review
Always
Iati

PWYF Review
Always
Iati

Independent Reviewer
Disagree
Iati

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Machine readable
http://datafagov.azurewebsites.net/Activities/Burkina_Faso.xml
Finance type is available in MCC's IATI files, and can be inferred from parent activities. However, this information cannot be automatically Expand...assessed as the data does not conform to the Aid Transparency Index methodology (the relevant activities do not contain dates, and therefore do not meet the requirements of the current data test)

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 99.96%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 2.81%


Publication Status

Always

Format: Machine-readable

Source

http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml

Comments

Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.


Click here to view history

26. Tied Aid Status

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.

Donor Review
Always
Machine readable

PWYF Review
Always
Machine readable

Independent Reviewer
Disagree

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Machine readable
http://data.mcc.gov/raw/xml/MCC_BF.xml
Published in the Burkina Faso XML file on MCC's website.

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 16.67%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

Always

Format: Document

Source

http://usaspending.gov/search?form_fields=%7B%22search_term%22%3A%22MILLENNIUM+CHALLENGE+CORPORATION%22%2C%22dept%22%3A%5B%229543%22%5D%7D&sort_by=dollars&per_page=25

Comments

This information was found in IATI at the time of the final data pull but failed the sampling checks and has therefore been scored by the manual survey. Summary contract information is published via the usaspending.gov site.


Click here to view history

31. Contracts

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Document
http://www.usaspending.gov/search?form_fields=%7B%22search_term%22%3A%22MILLENNIUM+CHALLENGE+CORPORATION%22%7D&sort_by=dollars&per_page=25&page=7
Contracts are published on the federal usaspending.gov

Donor Review
Always
Document

PWYF Review
Always
Document

Independent Reviewer
Disagree
Document

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Document
http://usaspending.gov/search?form_fields=%7B%22search_term%22%3A%22MILLENNIUM+CHALLENGE+CORPORATION%22%2C%22dept%22%3A%5B%229543%22%5D%7D&sort_by=dollars&per_page=25 Expand...
This information was found in IATI at the time of the final data pull but failed the sampling checks and has Expand...therefore been scored by the manual survey. Summary contract information is published via the usaspending.gov site.

Publication Status

Always

Format: Document

Source

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=agency&mode=form&tab=notices&id=fbbe1a8de95a1b0154a012d5d5e75675 http://www.mcc.gov/pages/business

Comments

Tenders are published on the federal business opportunities site. Others can be found on the MCC website.


Click here to view history

32. Tenders

Stage

Status

Format

Source

Comments

Researcher
Always
Document
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=agency&mode=form&tab=notices&id=fbbe1a8de95a1b0154a012d5d5e75675
Tenders are published on the federal business opportunities site.

Donor Review
Always
Document

PWYF Review
Always
Document

Independent Reviewer
Disagree
Document
In addition, small procurements and consultant opportunities are published on MCC's website: http://www.mcc.gov/pages/business

PWYF Final Assessment
Always
Document
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=agency&mode=form&tab=notices&id=fbbe1a8de95a1b0154a012d5d5e75675 http://www.mcc.gov/pages/business Expand...
Tenders are published on the federal business opportunities site. Others can be found on the MCC website.

Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 44.44%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 64.7%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 83.33%


Publication Status

IATI

Data quality: 100%