• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / Reports critical of UK aid
news

Reports critical of UK aid

By Katie Welford | Dec 12, 2012 | News

This week has seen the publication of two very critical reports on UK aid.

A report by the campaign group War on Want says Britain’s aid budget for Africa is increasingly being channelled through public-private investment funds based in the offshore tax haven of Mauritius.

The report says the Department for International Development (DFID) has sponsored a network of offshore investment funds and trusts for aid spending on infrastructure and agribusiness projects in Africa.

Meanwhile, the Independent Commission for Aid Impact (ICAI) – set up by the coalition government to ensure the aid budget was delivering value for money – said DFID has only limited oversight over aid expenditure through the EU.

ICAI’s traffic light rating – amber-red – is potentially misleading. The report concludes that DFID cannot currently provide satisfactory assurance that value for money is being achieved and necessary improvements are being implemented.

Responding to both reports, Publish What You Fund director David Hall-Matthews said:

“Both of these reports support the need for increased traceability in aid flows channelled through partners, to ensure accountability and value for money.

“Defining the legitimate limits of commercial confidentiality will only become a more pressing priority as more aid is channelled through private investment funds. Also, the European Commission must press ahead with its transparency plans and its forthcoming common results framework to demonstrate value for money to the UK taxpayer. This will enable robust conclusions about the impact of UK aid delivered by commercial and multilateral partners.”

 

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada China Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Joined-up data Kenya Letters Local funding Localisation Locally led development MDGs mobilisation Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter (X)

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)