• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2025
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Climate Finance
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / Accordion Items / DONOR SELECTION

DONOR SELECTION

By Toby Trembath | Jan 19, 2019 |

The Aid Transparency Index relaunched in 2026 with a new paid-for accreditation model. International organisations were given the opportunity to sign up to participate fully in the Index accreditation and assessment process, including full engagement, capacity building and formal recognition for their transparency performance.

The Index accreditation and assessment process is open to all aid organisations that meet a set of minimum criteria:

  1. Organisations engaged in international aid, development, humanitarian, climate change or related activities.
  2. Organisations with an annual budget of at least $20 million and at least 50 ongoing projects, investments or programmes. Smaller organisations would have limited benefits from the process.
  3. Organisations should have a formal commitment to transparency outlined in a policy or strategic document.

To maintain the Index’s role as an independent assessment of the leading aid and development organisations globally, the 2026 Index will also include 18 of the major bilateral donors assessed in the 2024 Index. These agencies opted not to sign up for the full accreditation process, but they will be scored alongside the accredited organisations, using the same assessment method and scoring approach, and will all appear in the Index ranking. A full list of the agencies assessed in the 2026 Index is included in the 2026 technical paper.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Transparency Index DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Joined-up data Kenya Letters Local funding Localisation Locally led development MDBs MDGs mobilisation Newsletter Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

LinkedIn

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)