• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / DFI Index / DFI Transparency Index 2023 / AIIB – non-sovereign
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2023

AIIB – non-sovereign

Score:
30.6
Position:
9 / 21

Overview

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a multilateral development bank with a mission to improve social and economic outcomes in Asia and beyond. It began operations in 2016. The non-sovereign portfolio of the AIIB provides financing for infrastructural projects in the private sector. 

Total asset size: $32bn (AIIB overall)
Key links
  • AIIB website
  • AIIB project database

Analysis

AIIB came ninth in the non-sovereign DFI assessment with 30.6 out of 100. AIIB discloses relatively large amounts of data, although much of that disclosure is in PDF format. As such, AIIB fails to score points for publishing in more accessible formats including through bulk download and to the IATI Standard. AIIB did relatively well in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component but not as well for the other four components. 

AIIB came ninth in the Core Information component for the non-sovereign assessment, with 9.31 out of 20. It disclosed data for fifteen of the seventeen indicators. However, it did not score over 50% for eleven of these indicators, principally because it did not publish to IATI or disclose data in a bulk download format.  

AIIB came in the bottom five in the Impact Management component with a score of 3.75 out of 25. It was the only non-sovereign DFI not to score for the impact measurement approach indicator. It only scored for the sector/country strategies and evaluations indicators. It did not score for any project-level indicators. 

AIIB performed relatively well in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component, coming third out of 21 non-sovereign DFIs with a score of 16.75 out of 30. It scored for all organisation-level indicators, almost getting 100%. It was only one of three non-sovereign DFIs to score for having an independent accountability mechanism (IAM) community disclosure policy. At the project level it scored for the summary of E&S risks, E&S project plans/assessments, and IAM global disclosure indicators. 

AIIB came joint bottom in the Financial Information component, with 0.75 out of 15. It only scored for the financial reports/statements indicator. It did not score for any project-level indicators.  

AIIB came joint bottom in the Financial Intermediary (FI) Sub-investments component with zero points. AIIB did not disclose sub-investments for private equity fund investments nor qualifying sub-investments for bank investments.

Core Information 9.31 / 20
Impact Management 3.75 / 25
ESG & Accountability to Communities 16.75 / 30
Financial Information 0.75 / 15
Financial Intermediary Sub-investments 0 / 10

Recommendations

  • AIIB should become an IATI publisher and disclose all investments to the IATI Standard. 
  • It should make its data available in a bulk download format to improve useability and accessibility.  
  • AIIB should disclose further Core Information indicators including disbursement data and date of activity disclosure and consistently disclose sub-national location, domicile, total investment cost, and funding source. 
  • It should disclose project-level Impact Management indicators, including additionality statement, activity indicators/metrics, and results. 
  • AIIB should also disclose information for the impact measurement approach indicator and its evaluations. 
  • It should consistently disclose all E&S documents that have been produced for its projects, especially the minimum documentation for higher risk projects. 
  • AIIB should provide assurance of community disclosure for investments when disclosure is required. 
  • For Financial Information indicators it should disclose for repeat investment, currency of investment, concessionality, mobilisation, and other instrument-specific data (share of equity, interest rate, and loan tenor). It should consistently disclose for the co-financing indicator. 
  • It should create a policy for the disclosure of FI sub-investments including all private equity sub-investments and qualifying bank sub-investments in line with the guidance from Publish What You Fund’s DFI Transparency Tool. It should also consistently disclose the FI (bank) use of funds. 
Core Information 9.31 / 20
Impact Management 3.75 / 25
ESG & Accountability to Communities 16.75 / 30
Financial Information 0.75 / 15
Financial Intermediary Sub-investments 0 / 10

Deep Dive

Core InformationImpact ManagementESG & Accountability to CommunitiesFinancial InformationFinancial Intermediary Sub-investments

Core Information

9.31 / 20
9 / 21
About component

The basic information that describes a DFI’s organisational policies and investments. This type of information is typically found in key organisation documents and represents the first tier of project information, typically disclosed on project web pages or in files available for bulk download. At the organisation level this includes access to information policies and annual reports. At the project level, this includes project titles, locations, and key dates.

Disclosure / access to information policy

Score: 2.25 out of 3

Accessibility

Score: 1.33 out of 2

Annual reports

Score: 0.75 out of 1

Project identification

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Status

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Project description

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Location

Score: 0.25 out of 1

Domicile (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 1

Sovereign / non-sovereign

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Sector

Score: 0.38 out of 1

Investment instrument

Score: 0.25 out of 1

Project costs

Score: 0.17 out of 1

Funding source

Score: 0 out of 1

Client

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Contacts

Score: 0.75 out of 1

E&S risk category

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Progress dates

Score: 0.19 out of 1

Impact Management

3.75 / 25
17 / 21
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, measures, and evaluates the impacts of their investments. At the organisation level, this includes an impact measurement approach. At the project level, this includes activity indicators/metrics and results.

Impact measurement approach

Score: 0 out of 5

Sector / country strategy

Score: 2.25 out of 3

Evaluations

Score: 1.5 out of 3

Additionality statement (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 2

Activity indicators / metrics

Score: 0 out of 6

Results

Score: 0 out of 6

ESG & Accountability to Communities

16.75 / 30
3 / 21
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, mitigates, and communicates the ESG aspects of their activities. At the organisation level this includes E&S global disclosure policy and E&S community disclosure policy. At the project level this includes E&S plans and assessments, and assurance of community disclosure.

E&S global disclosure policy

Score: 5 out of 5

E&S community disclosure policy

Score: 3 out of 4

IAM global disclosure documentation

Score: 2 out of 2

IAM community disclosure policy

Score: 2 out of 2

PGM community disclosure policy

Score: 2 out of 2

Summary of E&S risks

Score: 0.75 out of 2

E&S project plans / assessments

Score: 1 out of 4

Assurance of E&S community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Beneficial ownership (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 2

IAM global disclosure

Score: 1 out of 1

Assurance of IAM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Assurance of PGM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Financial Information

0.75 / 15
21 / 21
About component

This information provides details on the financial performance of DFIs and the structuring of investments. At the organisation level, this includes audited financial reports. At the project level, this includes currency of investment, mobilisation, and concessionality

Financial reports / statements

Score: 0.75 out of 1

Repeat investment

Score: 0 out of 1

Currency of investment

Score: 0 out of 1

Co-financing

Score: 0 out of 3

Concessionality (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 3

Mobilisation (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 3

Instrument-specific disclosure

Score: 0 out of 3

Financial Intermediary Sub-investments

0 / 10
21 / 21
About component

This information relates to the ways in which investments in FIs are used. At the organisation level, this includes FI sub-investment policy. At the project level, this includes private equity fund sub-investments and FI (bank) sub-investments.

FI sub-investment policy

Score: 0 out of 3.75

Private equity fund sub-investments

Score: 0 out of 2.5

FI (bank) use of funds

Score: 0 out of 1.25

FI (bank) sub-investments

Score: 0 out of 2.5
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2023

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)