• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / DFI Index / DFI Transparency Index 2023 / EBRD – sovereign
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2023

EBRD – sovereign

Score:
48.4
Position:
5 / 9

Overview

The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) is a multilateral development bank that aims to promote transition in central and eastern Europe, central Asia, and the southern and eastern Mediterranean. Its sovereign portfolio provides loans and guarantees as well as business advisory services to public institutions. EBRD’s shareholders include countries from the region and the rest of the world, plus the European Union and the European Investment Bank. EBRD is not an IATI member but started publishing to the IATI Standard in May 2015. EBRD was established in 1991. 

Total asset size: $85.3bn (EBRD overall)
Key links
  • EBRD website
  • EBRD project database
  • EBRD bulk download of commitments

Analysis

EBRD had the fifth highest score in the sovereign assessment with 48.4 out of 100. EBRD’s performance in the DFI Transparency Index was negatively affected by failure to score in key indicators including the publication of results and disclosure of loan agreements/contracts. EBRD publishes data to the IATI Standard and discloses project-level data in two files that are available for bulk download. 

EBRD’s sovereign portfolio came fifth in the Core Information component with a score of 19.02 out of 30. It scored for fifteen of the seventeen indicators. It scored 100% for eight of these indicators because it publishes to IATI and provides a bulk download file. It was the only sovereign DFI to score for all date survey questions in the progress dates indicator. However, EBRD dropped points for other indicators as not all data points were disclosed on the bulk download files. It also did not publish loan agreements/contracts for its investments. 

EBRD came sixth in the Impact Management component with a score of 12 out of 30. It scored points for all organisation-level questions apart from its approach to determining impact attribution. However, it did not score for any project-level indicators in this component. The failure to publish results for sovereign activities was central to it not performing better in the overall assessment.  

EBRD came fifth in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component with 16.33 out of 30. It scored for all organisation-level indicators apart from independent accountability mechanism (IAM) community disclosure policy. For project-level indicators it scored for the summary of E&S risks, E&S project plans/assessments, and IAM global disclosure indicators. It did not score for the assurance of community disclosure indicators. 

EBRD came third-last in the Financial Information component, with a score of 1 out of 15. It scored 100% for the financial reports/statements indicator but did not score for any project-level indicators. 

Core Information 19.02 / 30
Impact Management 12 / 30
ESG & Accountability to Communities 16.33 / 30
Financial Information 1 / 10

Recommendations

  • EBRD should disclose more data points in its bulk download file that it already publishes elsewhere, including total investment cost, E&S risk category, and approval date. 
  • It should publish data points that are already disclosed on its data portal to the IATI Standard, including sector and client contact. 
  • EBRD should disclose further Core Information indicators including sub-sector, disbursement, and funding source  
  • It should disclose loan agreements/contracts for its investments. 
  • It should disclose data for the results indicator and disclose consistently for the activity indicators/metrics indicator. 
  • EBRD should publish E&S documents for all investments, including the minimum documentation for higher risk projects. 
  • It should provide assurance of community disclosure for investments when disclosure is required. 
  • EBRD should develop a policy guiding the disclosure of the presence of the IAM at community level. 
  • It should consistently disclose project-level indicators in the Financial Information component, including for the currency of investment, co-financing, and instrument-specific disclosure indicators. 
Core Information 19.02 / 30
Impact Management 12 / 30
ESG & Accountability to Communities 16.33 / 30
Financial Information 1 / 10

Deep Dive

Core InformationImpact ManagementESG & Accountability to CommunitiesFinancial Information

Core Information

19.02 / 30
5 / 9
About component

The basic information that describes a DFI’s organisational policies and investments. This type of information is typically found in key organisation documents and represents the first tier of project information, typically disclosed on project web pages or in files available for bulk download. At the organisation level this includes access to information policies and annual reports. At the project level, this includes project titles, locations, and key dates.

Disclosure / access to information policy

Score: 1.5 out of 3

Accessibility

Score: 1.33 out of 2

Annual reports

Score: 1 out of 1

Project identification

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Status

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Project description

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Location

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Sovereign / non-sovereign

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Sector

Score: 0.56 out of 1.5

Investment instrument

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Project costs

Score: 0.75 out of 1.5

Funding source

Score: 0 out of 1.5

Client

Score: 1.5 out of 1.5

Contacts

Score: 1.31 out of 1.5

E&S risk category

Score: 0.75 out of 1.5

Progress dates

Score: 1.31 out of 1.5

Contract (sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 4.5

Impact Management

12 / 30
6 / 9
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, measures, and evaluates the impacts of their investments. At the organisation level, this includes an impact measurement approach. At the project level, this includes activity indicators/metrics and results.

Impact measurement approach

Score: 4 out of 6

Sector / country strategy

Score: 4 out of 4

Evaluations

Score: 4 out of 4

Activity indicators / metrics

Score: 0 out of 8

Results

Score: 0 out of 8

ESG & Accountability to Communities

16.33 / 30
6 / 9
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, mitigates, and communicates the ESG aspects of their activities. At the organisation level this includes E&S global disclosure policy and E&S community disclosure policy. At the project level this includes E&S plans and assessments, and assurance of community disclosure.

E&S global disclosure policy

Score: 5 out of 5

E&S community disclosure policy

Score: 4 out of 4

IAM global disclosure documentation

Score: 2 out of 2

IAM community disclosure policy

Score: 0 out of 2

PGM community disclosure policy

Score: 2 out of 2

Summary of E&S risks

Score: 1 out of 2

E&S project plans / assessments

Score: 1.33 out of 4

Assurance of E&S community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 3

IAM global disclosure

Score: 1 out of 1

Assurance of IAM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2.5

Assurance of PGM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2.5

Financial Information

1 / 10
7 / 9
About component

This information provides details on the financial performance of DFIs and the structuring of investments. At the organisation level, this includes audited financial reports. At the project level, this includes currency of investment, mobilisation, and concessionality

Financial reports / statements

Score: 1 out of 1

Currency of investment

Score: 0 out of 2

Co-financing

Score: 0 out of 4

Instrument-specific disclosure

Score: 0 out of 3
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2023

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)