NDB – non-sovereign
- Score:
- 20.2
- Position:
- 21 / 22 (Non-sovereign)
Overview
The New Development Bank (NDB), formerly referred to as the BRICS Development Bank, is a multilateral development bank established in 2014 by Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) with the purpose of supporting sovereign and non-sovereign projects among the five emerging markets through loans, guarantees, equity participation and other financial instruments. The New Development Bank is a new addition to the 2025 DFI Transparency Index.
Analysis
NDB’s non-sovereign portfolio ranked second-last out of 22 institutions assessed with a score of 20.2 out of 100. NDB’s overall performance was negatively affected due to not publishing to the IATI Standard and not having a bulk download file; all project-level points scored by NDB reflected disclosures on its project webpages.
In the Core Information component, NDB ranked 19th with a score of 7.10 out of 30. The points it scored at the organisational level were for having a disclosure policy, publishing detailed disaggregated data and publishing an annual report. At the project level, NDB did not score for unique identifier, domicile, sub-sector, investment instrument, disbursement, funding source, disclosure date and last update date.
NDB ranked third-last in the Impact Management component with a score of 5.50 out of 20. While it published its approach to impact attribution, evaluations, and aligned standards, it failed to publish an impact measurement approach, additionality approach and sector/country strategies. NDB failed all project-level impact indicators, including activity indicators/metrics and results.
In the ESG and Accountability to Communities component, NDB came second-last with a score of 5.50 out of 30. It scored 50 per cent for E&S global disclosure policy and 75 per cent for E&S community disclosure policy. However, NDB does not have an Independent Accountability Mechanism (IAM) so did not score for indicators related to that. It also did not have a policy on community disclosure for client-based project-level grievance mechanisms (PGMs). NDB did not pass for any project-level indicators including summary of E&S risks, E&S project plans/assessments and assurance of community disclosure.
In the Financial Information component, NDB came 15th of 22 institutions assessed with a score of 2.08 out of 15. It scored some points for publishing its financial statements, climate finance methodology and basic co-financing data. It failed to score any points on repeat investment, currency of investment, concessionality, mobilisation, instrument-specific disclosure and project-level climate finance indicators.
Finally, in the Financial Intermediary Sub-Investments component, NDB came joint last with a score of 0 out of 10. It failed to disclose any policy on disclosing sub-investments, and did not disclose any sub-investment or define use of funds.
Recommendations
- NDB should review its disclosure policy according to current best practice.
- It should make investment data available in a bulk download format.
- NDB should become an IATI publisher and disclose all investments to the IATI Standard.
- It should disclose further Core Information data including unique identifier, domicile, sub-sector, disbursement, funding source, disclosure date and last update date. It should consistently disclose investment instrument.
- NDB should publish its approaches to measuring impact and determining additionality, as well as its sector/country strategies.
- It should disclose project-level Impact Management indicators, including additionality statement, activity indicators/metrics and results.
- NDB should develop an early disclosure policy covering, at a minimum, high-risk projects and disclose investments in line with the policy.
- It should create an independent accountability mechanism (IAM), following best practice examples and incorporate disclosure requirements for an IAM into existing policies.
- NDB should develop a free, prior, and informed consent (FPIC) policy.
- NDB should disclose project-level ESG and Accountability to Communities indicators, including summary of E&S risks and E&S documentation.
- It should provide assurance of community disclosure for investments when disclosure is required. It should also disclose beneficial ownership statements and consistently identify the main shareholders of the client company.
- For Financial Information indicators it should disclose for repeat investment, identity of and amount provided by co-financers, concessionality, mobilisation and instrument-specific details. It should consistently disclose currency of investment.
- NDB should disclose whether investments include climate finance, amounts split by mitigation and adaptation, as well as a rationale for why climate finance has been counted.
- NDB should create a policy for the disclosure of FI sub-investments in line with Publish What You Fund’s DFI Transparency Tool.