• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home/DFI Index/DFI Transparency Index 2023/SIFEM (Switzerland) – 2023
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2025

SIFEM (Switzerland) – 2023

Score:
16.5
Position:
26 / 30

Overview

The Swiss Investment Fund for Emerging Markets (SIFEM), is a Swiss development finance institution. SIFEM was established in 2005, after taking over the investment portfolio of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). SIFEM promotes long-term, sustainable and broad-based economic growth in developing and emerging countries. It was restructured to its current form in 2011. It joined the European Development Finance Institutions Association (EDFI) in 2005. SIFEM is wholly owned by the Swiss Government.  

Total asset size: $698mn
Key links
  • SIFEM website
  • SIFEM project database

Analysis

SIFEM came third-last from the 21 non-sovereign DFIs assessed with a score of 16.5 out of 100. It came in the bottom five in all components of the index. SIFEM’s overall performance was negatively affected due to the fact that it does not disclose a bulk download export of investment data and does not publish to the IATI Standard. Also, it did not score for any project-level indicators in the four components other than in Core Information. 

SIFEM came fifth-last in the Core Information component, with 5.58 out of 20. It scored for eleven out of the seventeen indicators, failing to score for the access to information policy, status, domicile, funding source, E&S risk category, and progress dates indicators. SIFEM lost points for format of publication for many indicators due to there not being a bulk download available and for not publishing to the IATI Registry. It was one of six non-sovereign DFIs that did not score for an access to information policy. 

SIFEM came joint second-last in the Impact Management component with a score of 2.5 out of 25. It received these points just from the impact measurement approach indicator, but only scored 50% for the indicator. It did not score for any other indicator, including the project-level ones. 

SIFEM scored 7.67 out of 30 in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component. It scored 100% for its E&S and project-level grievance (PGM) community disclosure policies. It also scored points for E&S global disclosure policy. However, SIFEM did not score for any other indicators in this component, including project-level indicators. 

SIFEM came joint last in the Financial Information component, with 0.75 out of 15. It only scored points for the financial reports/statements indicator. Again, it did not score for any project-level indicators. 

SIFEM came joint last in the Financial Intermediary (FI) Sub-investments component because it scored zero. 

Core Information 5.58 / 20
Impact Management 2.5 / 25
ESG & Accountability to Communities 7.67 / 30
Financial Information 0.75 / 15
Financial Intermediary Sub-investments 0 / 10

Recommendations

  • SIFEM should create a disclosure/access to information policy in line with industry best practices and the DFI Transparency Tool. 
  • It should become an IATI publisher and disclose all investments to the IATI Standard. 
  • It should make its data available in a bulk download format to improve useability and accessibility. 
  • SIFEM should disclose further Core Information data including unique identifier, status, domicile details, sub-sector, disbursement data, funding source, E&S risk category, date of activity disclosure, approval date, signature date, and last update date. It should consistently disclose the sub-national location and total investment cost. 
  • It should disclose its impact measurement approach, approach to determining impact attribution, sector/country strategies, and evaluations. 
  • It should disclose project-level Impact Management indicators, including additionality statement, activity indicators/metrics, and results. 
  • SIFEM should disclose project-level ESG and Accountability to Communities indicators, including summary of E&S risks and E&S documentation. 
  • It should develop an early disclosure policy covering, at a minimum, high risk projects and disclose investments in line with the policy. 
  • SIFEM should create an independent accountability mechanism (IAM), following best practice examples It should develop an early disclosure policy covering, at a minimum, high risk projects and disclose investments in line with the policy. 
  • It should provide assurance of community disclosure for investments when disclosure is required.
  • For Financial Information indicators it should disclose concessionality, mobilisation, and instrument-specific details (including share of equity, interest rate, and loan tenor). It should consistently disclose for repeat investment, currency of investment, and co-financing indicators. 
  • SIFEM should create a policy for the disclosure of FI sub-investments in line with Publish What You Fund’s DFI Transparency Tool. 
Core Information 5.58 / 20
Impact Management 2.5 / 25
ESG & Accountability to Communities 7.67 / 30
Financial Information 0.75 / 15
Financial Intermediary Sub-investments 0 / 10

Deep Dive

Core InformationImpact ManagementESG & Accountability to CommunitiesFinancial InformationFinancial Intermediary Sub-investments

Core Information

5.58 / 20
17 / 21
About component

The basic information that describes a DFI’s organisational policies and investments. This type of information is typically found in key organisation documents and represents the first tier of project information, typically disclosed on project web pages or in files available for bulk download. At the organisation level this includes access to information policies and annual reports. At the project level, this includes project titles, locations, and key dates.

Disclosure / access to information policy

Score: 0 out of 3

Accessibility

Score: 0.67 out of 2

Annual reports

Score: 0.75 out of 1

Project identification

Score: 0.25 out of 1

Status

Score: 0 out of 1

Project description

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Location

Score: 0.25 out of 1

Domicile (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 1

Sovereign / non-sovereign

Score: 1 out of 1

Sector

Score: 0.25 out of 1

Investment instrument

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Project costs

Score: 0.17 out of 1

Funding source

Score: 0 out of 1

Client

Score: 0.5 out of 1

Contacts

Score: 0.75 out of 1

E&S risk category

Score: 0 out of 1

Progress dates

Score: 0 out of 1

Impact Management

2.5 / 25
19 / 21
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, measures, and evaluates the impacts of their investments. At the organisation level, this includes an impact measurement approach. At the project level, this includes activity indicators/metrics and results.

Impact measurement approach

Score: 2.5 out of 5

Sector / country strategy

Score: 0 out of 3

Evaluations

Score: 0 out of 3

Additionality statement (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 2

Activity indicators / metrics

Score: 0 out of 6

Results

Score: 0 out of 6

ESG & Accountability to Communities

7.67 / 30
15 / 21
About component

The ways in which a DFI predicts, mitigates, and communicates the ESG aspects of their activities. At the organisation level this includes E&S global disclosure policy and E&S community disclosure policy. At the project level this includes E&S plans and assessments, and assurance of community disclosure.

E&S global disclosure policy

Score: 1.67 out of 5

E&S community disclosure policy

Score: 4 out of 4

IAM global disclosure documentation

Score: 0 out of 2

IAM community disclosure policy

Score: 0 out of 2

PGM community disclosure policy

Score: 2 out of 2

Summary of E&S risks

Score: 0 out of 2

E&S project plans / assessments

Score: 0 out of 4

Assurance of E&S community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Beneficial ownership (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 2

IAM global disclosure

Score: 0 out of 1

Assurance of IAM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Assurance of PGM community disclosure

Score: 0 out of 2

Financial Information

0.75 / 15
12 / 21
About component

This information provides details on the financial performance of DFIs and the structuring of investments. At the organisation level, this includes audited financial reports. At the project level, this includes currency of investment, mobilisation, and concessionality

Financial reports / statements

Score: 0.75 out of 1

Repeat investment

Score: 0 out of 1

Currency of investment

Score: 0 out of 1

Co-financing

Score: 0 out of 3

Concessionality (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 3

Mobilisation (non-sovereign only)

Score: 0 out of 3

Instrument-specific disclosure

Score: 0 out of 3

Financial Intermediary Sub-investments

0 / 10
17 / 21
About component

This information relates to the ways in which investments in FIs are used. At the organisation level, this includes FI sub-investment policy. At the project level, this includes private equity fund sub-investments and FI (bank) sub-investments.

FI sub-investment policy

Score: 0 out of 3.75

Private equity fund sub-investments

Score: 0 out of 2.5

FI (bank) use of funds

Score: 0 out of 1.25

FI (bank) sub-investments

Score: 0 out of 2.5
DFI

DFI Transparency Index 2025

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)