• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / ODI briefing paper: Aid Effectiveness Through the Recipient Lens
news

ODI briefing paper: Aid Effectiveness Through the Recipient Lens

By Katie Welford | Feb 15, 2010 | News

Here is a great Overseas Development Institute briefing paper on ‘Aid Effectiveness through the recipient lens’ published in November 2009 which we missed the first time round (apologies). It argues that the impact of aid depends upon ‘procedures going beyond Paris and Accra’.
 
 
Whilst the best-practice principles of the Paris and Accra resolutions are a prerequisite for effective aid, this paper suggests that recipient governments consider these principles too narrow and insufficient for addressing the aid effectiveness challenges they face.   The paper is based on interviews with government officials in Ethiopia, Sierra Leone, and Zambia, which were added to previous relevant ODI research on stakeholder perceptions of aid. A key theme which emerged was that terms such as ‘predictability’ and ‘transparency’ lacked depth and definition, and that important procedures essential to donor accountability had not been fully captured, or yet agreed upon. We would agree and have tried to define what aid transparency is in our Publish What You Fund principles.
 

Read the briefing paper here.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Jobs Joined-up data Kenya Letters Localisation MDGs mobilisation Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter (X)

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)