• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / Aid transparency will show us what’s working from what’s not
news

Aid transparency will show us what’s working from what’s not

By Katie Welford | Apr 1, 2010 | News

Owen Barder, Director of AidInfo, a project of Development Initiatives, argues an important case for aid transparency in his excellent development blog illustrating another angle from which transparency is necessary for getting the best out of aid.

 
Barder reminds us that it is the nature of development that some aid ‘won’t work’, but what we must strive for is it reaching its potential. Comparing the aid game to business, organisms, and political parties, he points out that unlike the others, aid projects do not have to be effective to be continued. Where other processes, market, evolutionary or other will ‘kill off the unhelpful, ineffective and perhaps even downright harmful’, these forces, ‘barely work in aid’.
 
Increasing transparency with a standard and universal measure by which relative performance can be compared and assessed is needed to evaluate what works best and how money can be allocated more effectively. In other words, it would allow for a much-needed process of selection to occur, resulting in more aid better spent.
 
To read the article, click here.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Jobs Joined-up data Kenya Letters Localisation MDGs mobilisation Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter (X)

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)