• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
    • Project Advisory Board
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localization
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • Data Use
    • IATI Decipher
    • Improving UK Aid Transparency
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / Analysis of the Presidential Study Directive
news

Analysis of the Presidential Study Directive

By Katie Welford | May 14, 2010 | News

Publish What You Fund has put together an analysis of the leaked draft of the Presidential Study Directive on Global Development (PSD-7), "A New Way Forward on Global Development". Please find below.

Strengths:

  • Creating a U.S. Global Development Strategy, establishing a Development Policy Committee and developing regional development strategies. These should all help the coordination of information between different branches of the U.S government while ensuring coherence in development policy across U.S. agencies.

  • Strengthening development capabilities and the role of USAID, specifically calling for accountability for humanitarian and development assistance budget.

  • Division of labor among key donors, focusing on specific regions and concentrating expertise in fewer sectors.

  • Partnership with Congress in moving legislation forward with greater flexibility and a reduction of earmarks with much higher standards of accountability.

Weaknesses:

  • Overall- The document fails to address aid transparency and accountability at the donor level. It identifies the importance of accountability in recipient countries but progress is limited and immeasurable unless there is full disclosure of information at the donor level. As Deputy Secretary of State Jack Lew himself has noted: “We owe it to them (recipients) to be able to do the co-ordination and to have the capacity ourselves to go to them with a coherent program where the different pieces fit together.” (April 27, 2010, Senate Foreign Relations Committee on the Global Hunger Food Security Initiative)

  • Page 4- “There are a number of countries to which the U.S. has provided substantial assistance over years or decades, but which have made little development progress.” This progress can only happen when there is significant increase in the availability and accessibility of comprehensive, timely and comparable aid information from donors.

  • Page 5- “Forge a deliberate division of labor among key donors – will seek an explicit division of labor by concentrating our efforts on selected countries and regions and concentrating our expertise in a smaller number of sectors.” Co-ordination amongst donors is essential to achieve better results. This is best achieved by providing data in a comparable format. Comparability is essential to make the best use of taxpayers’ resources, however, in order to plan and deliver those resources to maximum effect the U.S. needs to be able to compare its efforts with other donor nations and the recipient countries’ own spending.

  • Page 6- “Establish mechanisms for ensuring coherence in U.S. development policy across the U.S. government – a U.S. Global Development strategy to be undertaken every 4 years, inter-agency Development Policy Committee (DPC). State and USAID will work to ensure the coherence of development co-operation, across U.S. agencies active in country under Chief of Mission authority.” While this is a very important step, the implementation of aid transparency principles and engagement in the International Aid Transparency Initiative will deliver on the U.S. Government’s own desire for greater transparency and better information management. It will also assist global aid transparency efforts and make real progress towards greater aid effectiveness and improved governance in recipient countries.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Budget ID Canada China Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany GPEDC Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Joined-up data Kenya Letters MDGs Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals Sweden UK United Nations US Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter

  • Our newsletter is out - featuring our striking research findings on USAID’s measurement of #localization, a review… https://t.co/F3gajILzKy
    Mar 21, 2023
  • We’re delighted that the 2024 Aid Transparency Index will go ahead with the support of @IATI_aid, and we can suppor… https://t.co/fvntLuPxM7
    Mar 16, 2023
  • We’re looking forward to the @IATI_aid Members’ Assembly next week. Ahead of his travels, @garyjforster reflects on… https://t.co/3SM0HNTGbi
    Mar 10, 2023
FOLLOW US
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)