• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / Blog / Donor aid transparency – challenges for NGOs in Nepal
blog

Donor aid transparency – challenges for NGOs in Nepal

By Katie Welford | Dec 18, 2012 | Blog

(Guest blog by Krishna Sapkota, Freedom Forum)

It is great to share with you that Freedom Forum has recently produced and published a study report titled ‘Aid Transparency Situation of Nepal’ as part of a wider pilot project to better understand the aid information landscape in Nepal and to make recommendations for future work to improve the availability and accessibility of information on aid and other resources.

In the report, which garnered considerable media attention with articles in both Republica and the Kathmandu Post national daily newspapers, Freedom Forum set out to map the availability of aid data in Nepal by conducting surveys among seven major donor agencies in the country: the World Bank (WB), the Asian Development Bank (ADB), the Department for International Development (DfID), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), the Norwegian Embassy, USAID and UNDP

Challenges in identifying the designated information officer at the donor agency, along with slow responses from donors meant that gathering the information proved to be very time-consuming and labour-intensive, demonstrating in practice the obstacles faced by civil society organisation (CSO’s) in Nepal who wish to gather information on aid.

The major findings of the study:

  • All agencies at central level reported that they share aid and project information with different stakeholders but there are significant differences in the level of information shared
  • No agencies provided complete budgetary information
  • Six out of seven agencies have assigned officers for information sharing, with DFID being the only agency which does not have a designated officer.
  • There is discrepancy between transparency levels claimed by donor agencies and what is in fact practiced
  • Knowledge of Aid Transparency and Accountability amongst heads of district/project offices seems very low. In fact, the project beneficiaries do not seem to have any knowledge on ATA at all.

The study recommends:

  • Designated information officer should be assigned in all agencies to provide aid related information to the stakeholders
  • Donor agencies should proactively share information regularly every three months to comply with the RTI ACT of Nepal and through the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI)
  • More comprehensive research and study on aid transparency should be carried out
  • The information that is provided is mostly in English, meaning it has little reach to the final beneficiaries. Different methods for information dissemination have to be adopted to make information more accessible
  • The Aid Management Platform (AMP)used by the Government of Nepal, must be integrated more effectively with the information of all government ministries and central bodies (including for example the Social Welfare Council) and all 75 Nepalese districts which receive and disburse foreign aid
  • Aid transparency should be planned and implemented at district and community levels through institutional learning and sharing best practice.

Krishna Sapkota is Executive Director of Freedom Forum, an independent, non-governmental and not-for-profit civil society organisation working for the cause of social accountability, democracy and human rights focused on press freedom, freedom of expression and right to information in Nepal. This blog was also posted on aidinfo.

 

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Jobs Joined-up data Kenya Letters Localisation MDGs mobilisation Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter (X)

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)