• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
    • Project Advisory Board
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localization
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • Data Use
    • IATI Decipher
    • Improving UK Aid Transparency
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / The Nairobi Outcome Document – a cautious welcome
news

The Nairobi Outcome Document – a cautious welcome

By Katie Welford | Dec 8, 2016 | News

Aid and development is not just about how much you spend, it’s the way that you spend it. Publish What You Fund has campaigned for transparent, effective aid since the ‘Accra Agenda’ was agreed in 2008. In 2011, donors committed to publish timely, comprehensive and forward-looking data on aid and development finance, and for the past five years, we have been holding them to that promise. The latest such meeting was convened in Nairobi last week by the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC), which Publish What You Fund attended together with governments and civil society groups from around the world.

Before the Nairobi conference, we wrote that “development effectiveness is not dead, but it’s on life support”. The Sustainable Development Goals drew attention to goals and targets, rather than how to pay for them or implement them; and the global crackdown on civil society and human rights continues apace.

In that context, we give a cautious welcome to the Nairobi Outcome Document. The Global Partnership did not make much progress, but it held the line on the achievements of previous years, and transparency is one of them. We were pleased to see providers of development cooperation commit to improving transparency through open data standards like the International Aid Transparency Initiative (IATI) (para 76a), as well as increasing support for data-use, both in development and humanitarian initiatives (para 76d). We were also pleased to see a commitment to make data standards inter-operable (para 73) so that data on aid and development finance can be joined up with budgets, contracts and extractive industry revenues.

However, while everyone now preaches transparency, they don’t always practise it. Our latest Aid Transparency Index shows that only 25% of aid worldwide meets the highest transparency standards. The challenge is particularly acute for development finance institutions and providers of South-South cooperation. We share the concern of the Civil Society Partnership for Development Effectiveness that the Nairobi conference enhances the role of the private sector in development without commensurate increases in transparency and accountability. It is essential that all financing for development, whether public, private or blended, is published and accounted for. We hope that businesses will “become increasingly transparent and responsive to all sections of society” (para 79a).

Who will hold the signatories of the Nairobi Outcome Document to account? The monitoring framework run by the GPEDC is a good start but lacks teeth: we haven’t seen anybody change their behaviour as a result of the monitoring report. However, there is an explicit agreement to address the “unfinished business” of the Paris Declaration and Accra Agenda, and to develop time-bound action plans in relation to these commitments (para 35).

At Publish What You Fund, we will take the signatories of the Nairobi Outcome Document at their word, and will continue our own, independent monitoring so that data can be used for better decision-making, accountability and learning.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Budget ID Canada China Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany GPEDC Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Joined-up data Kenya Letters MDGs Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals Sweden UK United Nations US Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter

  • Starting now! Is USAID’s localization mission falling short? Join @sallyppaxton in conversation with @Devex… https://t.co/riMxuVGi4Y
    Mar 29, 2023
  • Join us in one hour when @sallyppaxton will be discussing “Is USAID’s localization mission falling short?” with… https://t.co/GLP8VEsd4z
    Mar 29, 2023
  • This @icai_uk report also calls for the Home Office to be more deliberate, urgent and transparent in how it address… https://t.co/3RNzVeeq5w
    Mar 29, 2023
FOLLOW US
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)