SIFEM (Switzerland)
- Score:
- 32.5
- Position:
- 17 / 22 (Non-sovereign)
Overview
The Swiss Investment Fund for Emerging Markets (SIFEM), is a Swiss development finance institution. SIFEM was established in 2005, after taking over the investment portfolio of the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). SIFEM promotes long-term, sustainable and broad-based economic growth in developing and emerging countries. It was restructured to its current form in 2011. It joined the European Development Finance Institutions Association (EDFI) in 2005. SIFEM is wholly owned by the Swiss Government.
Analysis
Overall, SIFEM came 14th out of the 22 non-sovereign institutions assessed, scoring 32.5 out of 100. This marks a significant improvement from its performance in 2023 when it scored only 16.5 and ranked fourth to last. A key improvement across the board was SIFEM’s new bulk download export of investment data, which improved its format score throughout the assessment. Between 2023 and 2025, SIFEM saw improvements across all components other than ESG and Accountability to Communities where its score stayed the same. SIFEM continued to not publish its investments to the IATI Standard.
SIFEM scored 11.13 out of 20 in the Core Information component, moving from 17th to 12th in the rankings. It went form scoring on eleven out of the seventeen indicators to all seventeen in 2025. This improved performance is largely due to its new bulk download file disclosing investment data, which improved SIFEM’s score across many indicators. However, SIFEM also began disclosing new data points in this component including a new disclosure policy, unique identifier, status, domicile, total investment cost, funding source, E&S risk category, and signature date. SIFEM continued to not score for sub-national location, sub-sector, disbursement, disclosure date, signature date and last update date.
In the Impact Management component, SIFEM came 17th scoring 7 out of 20 and improving from its position as second to last in 2023. Its improved ranking is reflected in publishing its approach to determining impact attribution and impact measurement approaches. SIFEM also began disclosing additionality statements at the project level. However, it continued to not score for sector/country strategy, evaluations, activity indicators/metrics and results.
SIFEM scored 7.67 in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component, keeping its position as joint fourth last in 2023. Its performance showed no progress across all indicators in this component. It continued to score 100 per cent for its E&S and project-level grievance (PGM) community disclosure policies. It also continued to score points for E&S global disclosure policy. However, SIFEM continued to not score for any other indicators in this component, including project-level indicators.
For Financial Information, SIFEM scored 4.25 out of 15 and improving ranking from joint last in 2023 to 7th. It saw improvements on currency of investment, concessionality, and share of equity. It continued to not score for repeat investment, co-financing, and mobilisation. It did not score for either of the new climate finance indicators.
SIFEM scored 2.5 in the Financial Intermediary (FI) and Sub-Investment component, moving from joint last to joint third out of 22 non-sovereign portfolios. Its improved ranking is reflected in its new policy for disclosing sub-investments and new disclosure of private equity fund sub-investments. It continued to not score for the FI (bank) use of funds and FI (bank) sub-investments indicators.
Recommendations
- SIFEM should review its disclosure policy according to current best practice and the DFI Transparency Tool.
- It should become an IATI publisher and disclose all investments to the IATI Standard.
- SIFEM should disclose further Core Information data including sub-national location, sub-sector, disbursement, disclosure date, signature date and last update date.
- SIFEM should publish its sector or country strategies, develop an evaluation policy and disclose the evaluations it conducts.
- It should disclose project-level Impact Management indicators, including activity indicators/metrics and results.
- SIFEM should disclose project-level ESG and Accountability to Communities indicators, including summary of E&S risks and E&S documentation.
- It should develop an early disclosure policy covering, at a minimum, high-risk projects and disclose investments in line with the policy.
- SIFEM should create an independent accountability mechanism (IAM), following best practice examples and incorporate disclosure requirements for an IAM into existing policies.
- It should provide assurance of community disclosure for investments when disclosure is required.
- For Financial Information indicators, SIFEM should disclose repeat investment, mobilisation, and loan tenor. It should consistently disclose detailed co-financing data.
- SIFEM should disclose its climate finance methodology and should provide detailed project-level climate finance data, including amounts split by mitigation and adaptation finance and climate finance rationales.
- SIFEM should align its policy for disclosing FI sub-investments with the DFI Transparency Tool and disclose accordingly, including for sub-investments through banks.
- It should define use of funds for FIs (banks) at both the organisational and project level.