Swedfund (Sweden)
- Score:
- 34.2
- Position:
- =11 / 22 (Non-sovereign)
Overview
Swedfund International AB (Swedfund) is a Swedish development financier and development cooperation actor. Swedfund contributes venture capital, start-up aid, and expertise for investments in low- and middle-income countries. It was established in 1979 and joined The Association of European Development Finance Institutions (EDFI) in 1995. Swedfund is wholly owned by the Swedish state.
Analysis
Swedfund ranked joint 11th out of 22 non-sovereign DFIs assessed in the 2025 Index, with a score of 34.2 out of 100. This is up from 18th place out of 21 and a score of 19.3 in 2023. The notable progress is largely due to enhanced data accessibility, including the launch of its new database that allows a bulk download of disaggregated investment information. Additionally, Swedfund improved by having its projects published to IATI.
Swedfund ranked 7th in the Core Information component, with 13.54 out of 20. This represents a significant improvement from 2023, when it placed 15th. Progress in this component includes new disclosures on project status, funding source, client contact information, and more detailed progress dates (activity disclosure, signature and last update dates). However, Swedfund continued to fail on several indicators, including aspects of its disclosure policy, the use of an open licence, sub-national location data, total investment cost, and approval date. While it published unique identifiers, sub-sector information, and disbursement data to the IATI Standard, it does not publish these in any format to its data portal.
Swedfund came joint 12th in the Impact Management component with a score of 8 out of 25, improving from 18th place in 2023. The improved ranking reflects new disclosures, including its approach to measuring impact attribution, the publication of sector strategies through Theory of Change documents, and the addition of additionality statements on investment webpages. Swedfund failed on publishing an approach to impact measurement, evaluations and activity indicators and results.
Swedfund scored 10 out of 30 in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component, coming 13th. This is unchanged from 2023, where it also placed joint 13th. It scored 100 per cent for its E&S and project-level grievance mechanism (PGM) community disclosure policies. It also scored half of the points for E&S global disclosure policy. Swedfund does not have an independent accountability mechanism (IAM), therefore did not score for any of the indicators related to this area. One area of progress since 2023 is the introduction of an 'ESG Summary' section on each investment webpage, which now discloses E&S risks and identifies the applicable E&S standards for each investment.
For the Financial Information component, Swedfund came second-last of the non-sovereign institutions with a score of 1.42 out of 15. While co-financing disclosure improved, other indicators including concessionality, mobilisation, instrument-specific disclosure, repeat investment, and investment currency remain undisclosed. Swedfund also failed to meet any of the new climate finance indicators.
Finally, Swedfund scored 1.25 out of 10 in the Financial Intermediary Sub-Investments component, which was joint third lowest. It only scored for the FI (bank) use of funds indicator at the project level. It did not score for any policy-level indicators.
Recommendations
- Swedfund should review its disclosure policy according to current best practice.
- It should consistently disclose Core Information data including sub-national location and total investment cost and start disclosing approval date. Sub-sector and disbursement amounts should be disclosed within its own investment database and not just to the IATI Standard.
- It should disclose its impact measurement approach and evaluations.
- Swedfund should disclose project-level Impact Management indicators, including activity indicators/metrics and results.
- It should develop an early disclosure policy covering, at a minimum, high risk projects and disclose investments in line with the policy.
- Swedfund should create an IAM, following best practice examples and incorporate disclosure requirements for an IAM into existing policies.
- It should disclose project-level ESG and Accountability to Communities indicators, including E&S assessments/plans, assurance of community disclosure when required, and beneficial ownership and shareholder statements.
- For Financial Information indicators it should disclose currency of investment, concessionality, mobilisation, and loan tenor. It should consistently disclose for repeat investment and share of equity.
- Swedfund should disclose whether investments include climate finance, the amount split by mitigation and adaptation, as well as a rationale for why climate finance has been counted. It should also publish a climate finance methodology.
- Swedfund should create a policy for the disclosure of FI sub-investments and disclose in line with it.