AIIB – sovereign
- Score:
- 58.5
- Position:
- 5 / 10 (Sovereign)
Overview
The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) is a multilateral development bank with a mission to improve social and economic outcomes in Asia and beyond. It began operations in 2016. The sovereign portfolio of the AIIB provides financing for infrastructural projects to governments in Asian countries and beyond.
Analysis
AIIB’s sovereign portfolio ranked 5th out of 10 institutions with a score of 58.5 out of 100, marking an improvement from 6th place and a score of 47.1 in 2023. Most of the progress was driven by improvements in the Impact Management and ESG & Accountability to Communities components, with AIIB showing the greatest improvement among sovereigns in the ESG component. AIIB discloses relatively large amounts of data, although much of that disclosure is in PDF format. As such, AIIB fails to score points for publishing in more accessible formats including through bulk download and to the IATI Standard.
In the Core Information component, AIIB came 8th out of 10 with a score of 11.74 out of 30. In 2023 it came 7th in this component. It disclosed data for fifteen of the seventeen indicators. However, it did not score over 50 per cent for twelve of these indicators, principally because it did not publish to IATI or disclose data in a bulk download format. It did not score for sub-sector, funding source, disclosure date, signature date and investment contract.
AIIB ranked 5th with a score of 19 out of 30 in the Impact Management component, maintaining the same position as in 2023. It continued to score for both project-level indicators but dropped points again for not publishing to IATI. Notable improvements included new indication of aligned impact standards and newly consistent disclosure of indicator metrics/definitions. AIIB continued to lose points due to not publishing an impact measurement approach or an impact attribution methodology and not disclosing evaluations.
AIIB came joint 2nd in the ESG and Accountability to Communities component, with a score of 23.67 out of 30. This marks an improvement from 2023 where it ranked 4th. It scored on all organisational-level indicators, nearly achieving 100 per cent. At the project level, it scored for summary of E&S risks, E&S project plans/assessments and assurance of community disclosure. Improvements since 2023 were on identification of E&S standards triggered, and details on assurance of community disclosure including date, place, method and documentation.
In the Financial Information component, AIIB ranked 5th with a score of 4.08 out of 15, maintaining its 2023 ranking. It lost points for not consistently disclosing currency of investment (which it had passed in 2023), and for not disclosing loan pricing. It performed well on the new climate finance indicators, publishing a methodology as well as detailed climate finance project-level. But it lost points for allowing disclosing this information in PDF format and for not providing climate finance budget breakdowns.
Recommendations
- AIIB should review its disclosure policy according to current best practice.
- It should make investment data available in a bulk download format.
- It should become an IATI publisher and disclose all investments to the IATI Standard.
- It should disclose further Core Information data including sub-sector, funding source, disclosure date and investment contract. It should consistently disclose total investment cost and signature date.
- AIIB should publish its approach to measuring impact management and determining impact attribution. It should also disclose the evaluations it conducts.
- At the project level, AIIB should publish all activity indicators/metrics and results data to IATI.
- In its E&S policy, AIIB should specify when a document should be translated and in which language.
- AIIB should ensure that all identified E&S documents produced for an activity are disclosed.
- It should consistently disclose the language of disclosure to project-affected people when required.
- AIIB should state if the presence of a PGM and IAM was disclosed and the method it was disclosed at the community level.
- It should consistently disclose the currency of investment. It should also begin disclosing loan pricing data as well as a budget breakdown for climate finance data.