• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • FAQs
    • Case studies
  • The Index
    • 2020 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
  • Our Work
    • DFI Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • Data Use
    • IATI Decipher
    • Improving UK Aid Transparency
    • Webinars
  • News
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
    • Reports
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Friends of…
    • Our transparency
    • Annual Reports
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / DFIs weak on disclosure of ESG risks and transparency of community engagement
news

DFIs weak on disclosure of ESG risks and transparency of community engagement

By Sam Cavenett | Feb 19, 2021 | News

Transparency gaps make it difficult to hold DFIs to account

The transparency practices of development finance institutions (DFIs) rarely match up to their policies on the disclosure of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks and accountability, according to new research from our DFI Transparency Initiative. The research examined the transparency of 20 bilateral and multilateral DFIs and found that:

  • DFIs do not systematically provide assurance that community disclosure has taken place for their projects.
  • DFIs do not directly communicate to affected communities that options for recourse such as independent accountability mechanisms (IAMs) are available, and they do not require their clients to do this. In general, however, they do provide details of IAMs on their websites.
  • Global disclosure of project information is mixed – there is greater transparency among multilateral development banks, and for projects categorised as high risk. Many bilateral DFIs do not disclose any meaningful environmental or social information at the project level.

DFIs are intended to have positive development impacts but in many cases their projects pose significant environmental and social risks, and so it is critical that they be fully transparent about these risks and share plans to minimise or mitigate them. In the event that DFIs fail to follow such policies, it is also important that stakeholders know their options for recourse – such as IAMs.

This research is part of a broad programme that Publish What You Fund is undertaking, to examine and ultimately improve the transparency of DFIs. The DFI Transparency Initiative will release its detailed recommendations in September. CEO Gary Forster said:

“As more and more development aid is channelled through private institutions, we need transparency in order to assess the development impact of DFI investments, to learn from different investment approaches, make more informed decisions and allocate resources more effectively.”

“Our latest research highlights a worrying lack of assurance that community disclosure has taken place. There is a notable gap in evidence of community engagement after the early stages of project development, and very limited communication about recourse or grievance options to project affected communities. The failure to systematically confirm that meaningful community disclosure has occurred makes it difficult to assess any gaps between policy and practice or to hold DFIs to account.”

“In fact, evidence from IAMs shows that being transparent with respect to ESG and accountability is in the interest of DFIs, and can help to avoid costly complaints.

You can download the research paper, which presents the findings from our third work stream, below:

Download

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Accountability Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Budget ID Canada China Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany GPEDC Health Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Jobs Joined-up data Letters MDGs Newsletter Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Resources Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals Sweden UK United Nations US US foreign assistance World Bank

NEWS CATEGORIES

  • Blog
  • Case studies
  • Events
  • News
  • Uncategorized

REPORTS

  • Aid transparency
  • Aid Transparency Index
  • China
  • Climate Change
  • European Union
  • Multimedia
  • United States

Twitter

  • Our latest newsletter features research, interviews and blogs on #DFI #transparency, #ESG &… https://t.co/wScFT6YoTI
    Feb 26, 2021
  • Why is the transparency of ESG and community engagement important? And why should it matter to DFIs? We asked Peter… https://t.co/k0zgQSeXU8
    Feb 25, 2021
  • We sat down with Peter Woicke, former CEO of the IFC, to discuss why more transparent and better risk management an… https://t.co/aSDl6NSJRL
    Feb 24, 2021
FOLLOW US
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)