• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Publish What You FundPublish What You Fund

The Global Campaign for Aid and Development Transparency

  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

NEWSLETTER

CONTACT

  • Why it matters
    • Why transparency matters
    • Data use examples
    • Research into aid transparency
    • The Story of Aid Transparency
    • What you can do
    • Case studies
  • Aid Index
    • 2024 Index
    • 2022 Index
    • Comparison Chart
    • Methodology
    • Index Archive
    • Tools
    • The Power of the Aid Transparency Index
  • DFI Index
    • DFI Transparency Index 2023
    • DFI Research
    • DFI Transparency Tool
    • FAQs
  • Our Work
    • Women’s Economic Empowerment
    • Localisation
    • Mobilisation
    • Climate Finance
    • UK Aid Transparency
    • Gender Financing
    • Humanitarian Transparency
    • US Foreign Assistance
    • IATI Decipher
    • Webinars
    • Work Under Development
  • News
    • Reports
    • News
    • Events
    • Blog
  • About Us
    • Board
    • Team
    • Our transparency
    • Our Funders
    • Jobs
    • Annual Reports
    • Friends of…
    • FAQs
  • Training
Show Search
Hide Search
Home / News / Most donors are not matching their local funding pledges with action
news

Most donors are not matching their local funding pledges with action

By Henry Lewis | Dec 17, 2024 | Blog, News

Many bilateral donors have signed up to international agreements to take a more locally led approach and transfer a greater share of resources to local partners. But our new study finds that many of the same donors are not sharing any practical evidence of increased local funding. Commitments Without Accountability highlights that four out of five donors do not have localisation strategies or clear definitions, targets, or methods for measuring progress in funding shifts. Without transparent measurement and reporting, stakeholders cannot determine if localisation commitments are being fulfilled or hold donors accountable.

Of the five donors included in the study, the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) stands out as the only donor with a comprehensive target and public data measuring its progress toward local funding goals. While it is far from achieving its target to allocate 25% of direct funding to local partners by 2025, its structured approach can offer valuable lessons for other donors on tracking local funding.

Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has made some progress by developing dedicated documentation on locally led development which includes a definition and measurement indicators. The other donors in the study – Global Affairs Canada, the Netherlands’ Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office – have made slower progress on localisation.

Local Funding Matrix comparing 5 bilateral donors in their progress on tracking and monitoring funding to local organisations. Each donor is assessed against 8 questions: definition of localisation or locally led development; definition of local and national organisations; target or indicator on quantity of local funding; methodology to track local funding; clarity on denominator; publishes data on local funding flows; strategy on approach to localisation or locally led development; and has funding initiatives that prioritise/require local partners. USAID is the only donor to be marked with a tick for all 8 questions. Australia gets a tick for 3 questions - definition of localisation or locally led development, strategy on approach to localisation or locally led development, and has funding initiatives that prioritise/require local partners. Canada and the Netherlands are marked with only 1 tick for having funding initiatives that prioritise/require local partners. UK has no ticks.

All now have the opportunity to ensure their evolving strategies and systems support locally led development. Only then will we have the evidence to know if donor promises on localisation have been fulfilled.

Gary Forster, CEO of Publish What You Fund, said:

“Donors have been talking the talk on local ownership and locally led development for twenty years. But without clear targets, definitions and measurement we have no way of knowing how this has translated into practice. Localisation is about more than just funding – but directing more resources to local organisations in the global south is a critical element.”

“Enhanced transparency is vital for building understanding, partnerships and trust, and ultimately to make real progress on localisation. It’s time for donors to start walking the talk.”

You can read more about this study, Commitments without accountability: The challenge of tracking donor funding to local organisations, and our other work focusing on USAID’s measurement and reporting of local funding here.

Primary Sidebar

NEWS Topics

Africa Agriculture Aid transparency Aid Transparency Index Australia Canada Climate Change Data Revolution Data use Data Visualisation Development Finance institutions DFI Spotlight DFI Transparency Tool European Commission Financing for Development France Freedom of Information Gender Germany Humanitarian Impact International Aid Transparency Initiative Japan Jobs Joined-up data Kenya Letters Localisation MDGs mobilisation Newsletter OECD Open data Open government Press Releases Publish What You Fund Road to 2015 Sustainable Development Goals UK United Nations US USAID Webinar Women's Economic Empowerment World Bank

Twitter (X)

  • Contact Us
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • Vimeo
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Bluesky

Publish What You Fund. China Works, 100 Black Prince Road, London, SE1 7SJ
UK Company Registration Number 07676886 (England and Wales); Registered Charity Number 1158362 (England and Wales)