Norway, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Norad
Overview
Norway’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) and Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (Norad) share most of the administration and delivery of Norway’s development cooperation. The MFA is responsible for policymaking and governance while Norad is responsible for implementing and managing most ODA grants, including humanitarian aid and long-term development assistance. The Index considers information published by the MFA and Norad. Norway’s MFA is not an IATI member but started publishing IATI data in December 2015.
Analysis
Norway’s MFA and Norad stays in the ‘Fair’ category. While it has improved its overall score by over two points since the 2024 Index, mainly due to an improvement in performance data, it has also dropped points across the finance and budgets and project attributes components. MFA publishes to IATI on an annual basis.
MFA and Norad published all organisational planning and commitments indicators to IATI. However, allocation policy, procurement policy, audits, and country strategies all failed our data quality checks. All of these documents were found in other formats.
MFA and Norad performed poorly for the finance and budgets component, dropping nearly two points from the 2024 Index. It scored relatively well for budget alignment, commitments, and disbursements and expenditures. It lost points for disaggregated budgets and project budget documents because it did not disclose these to IATI. Neither were found in other formats. Its total organisational budget also lost points because it covered only one forward-looking year rather than the preferred three years.
MFA and Norad scored well below average for the project attributes component, again dropping points from 2024. It scored well for basic project information, including titles, descriptions, contact details, dates, sectors, status, and unique ID. MFA lost points for conditions and sub-national locations as data for these indicators was not published to IATI. Neither of these indicators were found in other formats.
MFA and Norad scored best on joining-up development data but remained slightly below average for this component. It published good data for flow type, aid type, finance type and tied aid status. Tenders and contracts were not published to IATI, although contracts were available in other formats and tenders appeared on a dedicated portal. It also lost points on the Networked data – participating organisation references test and did not publish transactions with valid receivers in its IATI data.
While MFA and Norad has improved its score for the performance component by five points since 2024, it still performs poorly across all these indicators. Data for objectives, pre-project impact appraisals, results, and reviews and evaluations was not published to IATI. Only objectives were found on the MFA’s website, while none of the other three indicators were consistently found in other formats.
Recommendations
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should improve the quality of its organisational planning and commitments information by ensuring that its allocation policy, procurement policy, audit reports and country strategies meet the relevant data quality requirements when published to IATI.
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should publish disaggregated budgets and project budget documents to IATI, ensuring that these are available in a sufficiently detailed and accessible format. It should also extend its total organisational budget beyond one year to provide at least three years of forward-looking information.
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should publish sub-national location information and disclose activity-specific conditions, or state where no conditions apply, to improve the completeness of its project-level data.
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should publish tenders and contracts to IATI. While these are available through other formats, publishing them in the IATI Standard would make the information more accessible.
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should improve the publication of transactions with valid receivers to strengthen the networked use of its IATI data.
- Although Norway’s MFA and Norad improved its performance score, it should substantially strengthen its publication of objectives, pre-project impact appraisals, results, and reviews and evaluations. This information is essential for learning and assessing development effectiveness.
- Norway’s MFA and Norad should seek to improve the frequency of its IATI publication beyond the current annual basis to ensure that information is more timely and regularly updated.
Deep Dive
Component and overall scores are calculated using unrounded indicator scores. Individual indicator scores are rounded to one decimal place and may therefore not sum exactly to the displayed totals.
