The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria
Overview
The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (Global Fund) is a partnership between governments, civil society, and the private sector. Formed in 2002, it raises and invests money to fight infectious diseases in over 100 countries. The Global Fund supports in-country programmes and works with affected communities to tailor responses and strengthen health systems. The Global Fund became a member of IATI and first published IATI data in November 2011.
Analysis
While the Global Fund has remained in the ‘Good’ category, its score has fallen by more than 15 points since the 2024 Index. Scores declined across all five Index components. Its IATI publication frequency also fell from monthly to less than quarterly, with updates approximately six months apart.
Global Fund dropped nearly four points for the organisational planning and commitments component. It made some of the indicators available on IATI including annual reports, procurement policies, and organisational strategies. No allocation policy or audit was available in IATI, but these were found on its website during the manual survey. Global Fund made no forward-looking country strategies available in any format and scored zero points for this indicator. It also lost points for the quality of its access to information policy, as it has no public interest override nor an independent appeals process.
The biggest drop in score for Global Fund came in the finance and budgets component, where it fell nearly six points. While it published good data for project budget documents, commitments, disaggregated budgets, and expenditure and disbursements, it dropped points for budget alignment, project budgets, and total organisation budget, all of which have not scored as well when compared to 2024.
Global Fund dropped some points on project attributes, but the majority of indicators passed including project titles, descriptions, locations, dates, sector, unique ID, and project status. Conditions failed our data quality checks as all the documents were not specific to the activities.
Global Fund scored slightly below average for the joining-up development data indicators, as it dropped one point compared to 2024. It scored full points for flow type, aid type, finance type, tied aid status, Networked data – implementers, and Networked data – transactions with valid receiver. However, it failed to disclose its contracts and tenders. We found tenders in other formats but could not find contracts. Global Fund also dropped points on the Networked data – participating organisation references test for not providing a standard reference within its data.
In the performance component, Global Fund dropped over two points from 2024. It scored well on the objectives and results indicators but failed data quality checks for results documents, pre-project impact appraisals, and reviews and evaluations. Reviews and evaluations were sometimes found on the Global Fund website, but this was inconsistent. No pre-project impact appraisals were found elsewhere.
Recommendations
- Global Fund should resume more frequent IATI publication, ideally on a monthly basis, to ensure that its data remains timely and useful to users.
- Global Fund should publish its allocation policy, audit report and forward-looking country strategies to IATI and ensure that they are timely and accessible.
- Global Fund should strengthen its access-to-information policy by narrowing exceptions through objective harm tests, introducing a public-interest override and establishing an independent appeals process.
- Global Fund should improve the completeness and quality of its financial information, particularly project budgets and total organisational budgets, to address the areas where its score has declined since 2024.
- Global Fund should ensure that conditions information is specific to the relevant activities and meets the data quality requirements.
- Global Fund should publish contracts and tenders to IATI and use standardised references for participating organisations to strengthen interoperability.
- Global Fund should improve the quality of its performance information, particularly results, pre-project impact appraisals, and reviews and evaluations. It should ensure that results documents are current and meet the relevant quality requirements and publish comprehensive pre-project impact appraisals to IATI. Where reviews and evaluations are available on its website, these should also be consistently made available through IATI.
Deep Dive
Component and overall scores are calculated using unrounded indicator scores. Individual indicator scores are rounded to one decimal place and may therefore not sum exactly to the displayed totals.
